Sample AI Visibility Report

NovaTech AI (a fictional company) · B2B AI Workflow Automation · novatech-ai.example

12 Queries tested
4 AI surfaces scanned
48 Responses analysed
15 Queries where you appear
GPT-class 42
Perplexity 28
Gemini 44
Claude 31

Executive Summary

What's working

  • Gemini has the strongest coverage of your brand (44/100 — your best surface)
  • Gemini describes your category accurately in 5 of 12 queries
  • Brand queries ("what is NovaTech AI") return correct information across 3 of 4 surfaces

Critical gaps

  • 62.5% of tested queries return no mention of you — competitors fill all of that share
  • Pricing is wrong in 12 of 16 GPT-class responses ($29/mo cited; actual is $49/mo)
  • Perplexity confuses you with a different product in 6 of 10 mentions
  • You are absent from every comparison and Zapier-alternative query

Top 3 immediate actions

  1. Fix pricing page — correct the $29 error cited across AI surfaces
  2. Publish an entity definition page that clearly distinguishes you from "Nova AI"
  3. Create NovaTech vs Zapier and NovaTech vs Make.com comparison pages

Per-surface breakdown

How each AI model sees and describes NovaTech AI across the 12-prompt panel.

GPT-class open model (Llama 3.3)

42 D
5/40 Queries where you appear
2/40 Queries where you're recommended
Positive 44% Neutral 38% Negative 18%
⚠ Top issue

Cites outdated pricing ($29/mo instead of $49/mo) in 4 of 5 responses

""NovaTech AI is an option worth considering for teams looking to automate repetitive workflows. It offers AI-native automation, though plans can run higher than alternatives like n8n. Starting around $29/month for small teams…""

— GPT-class open model (Llama 3.3) response to: "best AI workflow automation tools for startups"

Generally aware of your category positioning but conflates you with older product version. Pricing confusion could cost paid conversions.

Perplexity

28 E
3/40 Queries where you appear
1/40 Queries where you're recommended
Positive 25% Neutral 45% Negative 30%
⚠ Top issue

Entity confusion: often conflated with "Nova AI" (a different product)

""Nova AI (also referred to as NovaTech in some contexts) is an AI productivity platform. It offers chatbot and workflow features…" [Note: describes a different product]"

— Perplexity response to: "NovaTech AI review"

Critical entity clarity problem — Perplexity cannot reliably distinguish you from competitors with similar names. Structured data and consistent brand signals needed urgently.

Gemini

44 D
5/40 Queries where you appear
2/40 Queries where you're recommended
Positive 52% Neutral 35% Negative 13%
⚠ Top issue

Omits enterprise SSO/SAML features — makes you appear less enterprise-ready

""NovaTech AI is a solid choice for teams automating internal workflows. It integrates with popular tools and offers a clean no-code interface. For enterprise needs with SSO requirements, you may want to evaluate options like Zapier or Make.com which have more established enterprise tiers…""

— Gemini response to: "AI automation tools with enterprise features"

Best narrative accuracy of all surfaces but lacks differentiated feature knowledge. Misses your enterprise-grade credentials which weakens positioning in mid-market queries.

Claude

31 E
3/40 Queries where you appear
1/40 Queries where you're recommended
Positive 30% Neutral 55% Negative 15%
⚠ Top issue

Described only as "an AI automation tool" — no specific feature differentiation

""There are several AI automation platforms that could help with customer onboarding workflows. Popular options include Zapier, Make.com, and n8n for no-code setups, or more developer-focused options…" [NovaTech AI not mentioned]"

— Claude response to: "how to automate customer onboarding with AI"

Lowest differentiation of any surface. Claude has limited factual knowledge about your specific product — you need more high-quality, citable content published about specific use cases and features.

Share of Voice vs competitors

% of queries per cluster where each brand appears across all 4 AI surfaces.

NovaTech AI Zapier AI Make.com n8n
Category queries
37%
73%
54%
51%
Use-case queries
22%
81%
62%
58%
Comparison queries
14%
89%
71%
66%
Problem-based queries
28%
67%
48%
44%
Price/value queries
19%
72%
53%
79%
Industry queries
31%
61%
47%
42%
Technical queries
24%
58%
44%
73%
Brand/review queries
68%
72%
59%
61%

NovaTech AI averages 28% SOV across all clusters vs 71% for Zapier AI, 54% for Make.com, and 59% for n8n. Comparison queries are the most acute gap.

Query coverage map

All 12 queries shown — this is the full prompt panel for a Signal.

Query Cluster GPT-class PPX GEM CLD
best AI workflow automation tools Category ✓ — ✓ —
automate Slack notifications with AI Use-case — — — —
Zapier alternatives for AI teams Comparison — — — —
how to reduce manual data entry with AI Problem ✓ — ✓ —
AI automation for startups affordable Price — — — —
AI tools for operations teams Industry ✓ — ✓ —
no-code AI workflow builder 2026 Technical ✓ ✓ ✓ —
what is NovaTech AI Brand ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
NovaTech AI pricing Brand ✓ — ✓ —
automate customer onboarding AI Use-case — — — —
Make.com vs alternatives Comparison — — — —
enterprise AI workflow automation Industry ✓ — — —

Top 5 gap queries

High-value queries where competitors appear and you don't — the most actionable opportunities.

1

"Zapier alternatives for AI automation"

Competitors appearing: Zapier AIMake.comn8n

Why you're missing: No comparison page exists

2

"automate customer onboarding with AI"

Competitors appearing: Make.comn8n

Why you're missing: No use-case content for this workflow

3

"AI workflow automation startups cheap"

Competitors appearing: n8n

Why you're missing: Pricing page unclear on startup tiers

4

"AI tools for operations teams 2026"

Competitors appearing: Zapier AIMake.com

Why you're missing: No industry-vertical landing pages

5

"automate repetitive tasks AI best tools"

Competitors appearing: Zapier AIMake.comn8n

Why you're missing: Not featured in roundup articles that AI cites

Narrative coherence & entity clarity

Are all four AI models telling the same story about you?

54

Narrative Coherence

How consistently AI models describe you

✓ Models agree on

  • You make workflow automation software
  • You offer a no-code interface
  • You integrate with popular business tools

✗ Models disagree on

  • Pricing: $29/mo vs $49/mo vs "starts at $99" cited across surfaces
  • Target market: "startups" vs "enterprise" vs "SMBs"
  • Integration count: 100 vs 200 vs 300+ cited inconsistently
  • Founded date: models cite 2020 (actual founding: 2022)
61

Entity Clarity Score

How precisely AI "knows" what you do

✓ Clearly defined

  • Company name and general product category
  • Primary value proposition (workflow automation)

✗ Unclear or wrong

  • Specific ICP (who exactly is your customer?)
  • Pricing structure and current tier names
  • Key differentiating features vs Zapier
  • Confused with "Nova AI" by Perplexity (entity collision)

Misinformation audit

Factual errors detected in AI model responses about NovaTech AI.

3 factual errors found
2 AI surfaces affected
High Revenue-risk level
Error 1 of 3

Incorrect pricing cited across two surfaces

The GPT-class model and Perplexity consistently cite your starting price as $29/month. Your actual starting price is $49/month. This creates a 41% pricing expectation gap — prospects arrive expecting a lower price and convert at lower rates or churn on sticker shock.

Surfaces affected: GPT-class Perplexity
Fix: Update pricing page with clear, current prices. Add PriceSpecification schema markup. Publish a "Plans & Pricing" blog post that AI models will cite.
Error 2 of 3

Feature capability error across 2 surfaces

The GPT-class model and Gemini describe NovaTech AI as offering enterprise SSO and SOC 2 compliance, which the product does not yet support. Prospects in security-conscious segments are being told the product clears procurement bars it hasn't cleared.

Surfaces affected: GPT-class Gemini
Fix: Publish a clear "Security & Compliance" page stating current status and roadmap. Add matching FAQ schema so models stop inferring capabilities that aren't documented.
Error 3 of 3

Market positioning error — wrong ICP cited

Perplexity and Claude repeatedly position NovaTech AI as an e-commerce tool, when the actual target market is B2B workflow automation. Buyers searching for the correct category are unlikely to surface the brand at all.

Surfaces affected: Perplexity Claude
Fix: Tighten category language sitewide (homepage H1, meta description, About page) to name the actual ICP explicitly, and add comparison content against e-commerce tools clarifying the difference.

Prioritised fix roadmap

10 actions ranked by impact-to-effort ratio. Estimated lift in AI Visibility Score per action.

1
Critical +8–12 pts

Fix pricing page: update to correct $49/mo starting price and add clear tier table

Effort Impact
2
Critical +10–15 pts

Publish a clear entity definition page ("What NovaTech AI is, does, and for whom")

Effort Impact
3
High +6–9 pts

Create comparison pages: "NovaTech vs Zapier" and "NovaTech vs Make.com"

Effort Impact
4
High +4–6 pts

Add Organization + SoftwareApplication schema to homepage and pricing page

Effort Impact
5
High +5–8 pts

Publish 5 use-case guides covering top gap clusters (onboarding, ops, data entry)

Effort Impact
6
Medium +3–5 pts

Get listed on G2, ProductHunt, AlternativeTo with consistent brand description

Effort Impact
7
Medium +3–4 pts

Create a dedicated Integrations page listing all connectors with descriptions

Effort Impact
8
Medium +4–7 pts

Pitch for inclusion in 3+ roundup articles AI models reference frequently

Effort Impact
9
Medium +2–4 pts

Publish clear enterprise features page (SSO, SAML, SLAs, data residency)

Effort Impact
10
Low +1–3 pts

Create public product changelog — AI models cite versioned, dated product info

Effort Impact

Estimated lift ranges are illustrative for this sample. Actual improvement depends on implementation quality, how quickly content is indexed, and AI model update cycles.

How This Check Works

01

Query panel construction

We build a 12-prompt panel across topic clusters (such as category, use case, comparison, problem, price and brand) matched to your category and the buyers you sell to.

02

Multi-surface execution

Each prompt is run fresh, in a new session, across a GPT-class open model (Llama 3.3), Perplexity, Gemini and Claude — 48 responses in total.

03

Mention detection & classification

Each response is scored for: brand mention, recommendation context, sentiment, factual accuracy, and competitor co-occurrence. Entity collision is checked separately.

04

Score calculation

AI Visibility Score = weighted composite of mention rate (40%), recommendation rate (30%), sentiment (15%), and narrative accuracy (15%). Per-surface scores use the same formula.

Ready to fix what AI says about you?

This is a sample — your report would cover your actual brand, your real queries, and your actual competitors. AI Visibility Signal is completely free: no card, no upsell, just the report above.